← Back to 清史稿

卷52 志二十七 时宪八

Volume 52 Treatises 27: Calendar 8

Chapter 52 of 清史稿 · Draft History of Qing
← Previous Chapter
Chapter 52
Next Chapter →
1
The upper section of the new occultation-parallax method was written in the Daoguang era by Si Tingdong, Autumnal Official of the Directorate of Astronomy. It refines the older procedure and is appended at the end of this fascicle for reference.
2
Finding apparent time
3
退 西 使
When computing the celestial motions of the planets, all procedures take the Sun as the reference; while the Sun's true motion is itself derived from mean motion. Stepwise calculation always begins at midnight each day. Here "midnight" means mean midnight: the instant when the Sun's mean longitude reaches the first quarter-mark of the midnight hour. Modern time-stepping may scale between two midnights using true motion, yet the result still marks where mean motion stands; the point where true motion stands therefore advances or lags on its own. If, after perigee, true motion exceeds mean motion, the Sun's apparent position lies east of the mean; in clock time this reads as behind schedule. If, after apogee, true motion falls short of mean motion, the Sun's apparent position lies west of the mean; in clock time this reads as ahead of schedule. Thus an equation due to be added becomes a time correction to subtract, and one due to be subtracted becomes a correction to add. This equation-of-time correction comes from the difference between mean and true solar motion. The Sun moves along the ecliptic, but civil time is measured on the equator. Because the two circles meet obliquely, the same rising instant yields different degrees on each. After the equinoxes the equatorial arc is shorter than the ecliptic arc, so the correction is subtracted and the clock reads as behind. After the solstices the equatorial arc is longer, so the correction is added and the clock reads as ahead. Use a right spherical triangle to find the ecliptic–equator ascension difference, convert it to time: add after equinoxes, subtract after solstices. This ascension time correction comes from measuring longitude on the ecliptic while time runs on the equator. The two corrections from the Sun's daily and anomalistic motion are applied to mean time to get apparent time, and only then can other quantities follow. Eclipse work therefore begins with apparent time — the first requirement in solar and lunar eclipse calculation. The theory and diagrams appear in the front fascicle of the Kaocheng with full explanation. The figures are split in two, and the equation-of-time diagram uses an epicycle. The rear fascicle replaces epicycles with ellipses for the equation, and the theory is complete in that chapter, but it does not treat the time correction. From the ecliptic point of true solar longitude, use the equation to find the mean point. Project both mean and true points onto the equator with parallel circles along the polar and solstitial meridians, so both corrections appear in a single figure. The instant of solar longitude and how to add or subtract both time corrections can then be read straight from the diagram.
4
西
For example, on the sixth day of the third month, Daoguang year 12 (renchen), at 8:11 p.m., the Moon and the fourth star of Simai share the same ecliptic longitude — the mean occultation time. That day the Sun's argument is 3°55′ in mansion 3; ecliptic longitude 15°53′ in mansion 3. Find apparent time. In the figure: A is the north celestial pole; B, C, D, E mark the equator; B–A–D is the meridian, with B at midnight and D at noon; F, G, H, I are the ecliptic, with F at winter solstice, H at summer solstice, G at spring equinox, and I at autumn equinox; C–A–E is the polar–solstitial meridian. Point Z marks true solar motion; projected to the equator at Chou, Chou is the apparent time when the Sun is actually there. Point Mao marks mean solar motion, projected to the equator at Chen. The arc Mao–Zi is the +1°55′45″ equation. Through Mao and Zi, draw parallels to the polar–solstitial meridian (like small circles) to project mean and true longitude onto the equator: arc G–Wu equals G–Mao, arc G–Wei equals G–Zi, and on the equator Wu–Wei equals the equation Mao–Zi. In time this is 7m43s on the equator between Wu and Wei — the equation-of-time correction. Next solve the right spherical triangle G–Chou–Zi for arc G–Chou: right angle at Chou, angle G = obliquity 23°29′, side G–Zi = 15°53′ ecliptic longitude after the spring equinox. Use the proportion: radius : cos(obliquity) :: tan(ecliptic arc G–Zi) : tan(equatorial arc G–Chou). The table gives G–Chou = 14°37′36″ — equatorial longitude after the spring equinox. Subtract the ecliptic arc G–Zi from the equal arc G–Wei to get Chou–Wei = 1°15′24″ — the ascension correction to subtract. In time this is 5m2s — the ascension time correction. At mean point Mao, arc G–Mao from the equinox equals G–Wu, so Wu marks mean time — the stated occultation moment. At true point Zi, G–Zi equals G–Wei from the equinox, so Wu–Wei is the mean–true difference. In heliocentric terms true motion has passed mean; in diurnal terms it lags. Wei therefore comes before Wu, so subtract the equation correction Wu–Wei to get Wei — the time of the Sun's ecliptic position projected onto the equator. At Zi the Sun actually stands on the equator at Chou, so Chou–Wei is the ecliptic–equator difference. In longitude the equator lags the ecliptic; in clock time it leads. Chou therefore comes after Wei, so add the ascension correction Chou–Wei to reach Chou — when the Sun's true ecliptic position meets the equator. One correction adds, one subtracts, and the subtracted term is larger. Subtract them to get Chou–Wu = 2m41s as the net correction. Opposite signs subtract; like signs add — combining the two into one. Because subtraction dominates, apply the net as a subtraction; if addition were larger, apply it as an addition instead. Subtract from the mean occultation at 8:11 p.m. to get 8:08:19 p.m. at Chou — the apparent occultation time.
5
First ratio: radius
6
Second ratio: cosine of angle G
7
Third ratio: tangent of arc G–Zi
8
Fourth ratio: tangent of arc G–Chou
9
Diagram omitted
10
Suppose another occultation at 1:00 a.m., with argument 13°29′ in mansion 3 and true ecliptic longitude 25°34′ in mansion 3. Find apparent time. With Zi as true solar motion projected to Chou on the equator, Chou is the apparent time. Mean point Mao projects to Chen, with equation Zi–Mao = +1°52′25″. Parallel circles Mao–Chou and Zi–Wei bring mean motion onto the equator exactly at Chou, where true motion stands. Mean time then equals apparent time, so no net correction is needed. This is known because both corrections are equal and cancel, leaving no net time difference. Following the method with lines Mao–Chou and Zi–Wei: G–Chou = G–Mao and G–Wei = G–Zi, so Chou–Wei need not equal the equation Mao–Zi. In time this is 7m30s to subtract on the equator. Solve triangle G–Chou–Zi for equatorial arc G–Chou; subtract the equal ecliptic arc from G–Wei to get Chou–Wei — the ascension difference exactly equals the equation. In time this is also 7m30s — the ascension correction to add on the equator. One correction adds, one subtracts, but both are 7m30s and cancel. With no net correction, the mean occultation time is the apparent time. Subtract the equation correction from the Chou occultation to get Wei's projected time, then add the equal ascension correction — apparent time remains at Chou because mean ecliptic longitude after the equinox equals true equatorial longitude after the equinox. When the Sun is at perigee or apogee there is no mean–true difference and no equation correction — only the ascension correction applies. At perigee and midnight, with the Sun at ecliptic Zi, G–Yi = G–Zi. Triangle G–Chou–Zi gives ascension difference Chou–Yi. Convert to time, subtract from the Yi moment, and Chou apparent time falls before midnight at Yi. At apogee and noon, with the Sun at ecliptic Wu, R–D = R–Wu. Triangle R–Yin–Wu gives ascension difference Yin–Ding; subtract from the Ding moment to get Yin apparent time before noon.
11
Diagram omitted
12
At the solstices or equinoxes there is no ecliptic–equator difference and no ascension correction — only the equation correction applies. At summer solstice (mansion 6°0), true Sun at Xin projects to Wu on the equator; mean Mao to Chen. Parallel circle Mao–Wu gives occultation at Wu; Wu–Wu equals equation Xin–Mao, which converts to the equation time correction. Subtract from the noon occultation point to reach Wu on the equator — the apparent time.
13
Diagram omitted
14
Finding equinox offset from noon, yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude, and limiting altitude
15
西 西退 西西 西西
Lunar occultation parallax uses the rear fascicle's solar-eclipse three-difference method, but applies it differently. In solar eclipse, east–west difference yields apparent distance arc and north–south difference yields apparent latitude; both serve to find apparent separation and apparent motion. Because the Moon follows the lunar path, calculations must use the white ecliptic quadrant. Planet–star and planet–planet separations use the moment of equal ecliptic longitude, comparing ecliptic latitudes for north–south offset. Moon–planet and Moon–star occultations likewise use equal ecliptic longitude and ignore lunar-path longitude — so the white ecliptic quadrant does not apply. Yet east–west difference sets apparent-time advance or lag, north–south difference sets apparent latitude, and both fix apparent distance — all are ecliptic longitude–latitude differences, so the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude is required. The yellow ecliptic quadrant is the midpoint of the ecliptic arc above the horizon. Because the ecliptic and equator meet obliquely, the equatorial midpoint above the horizon always lies on the meridian, but the ecliptic midpoint shifts with the season. The ecliptic pole, carried on the small circle of the negative ecliptic pole, rotates westward with the sky once per day around the celestial pole. When the ecliptic pole lies south of the celestial pole, winter solstice comes at noon and the ecliptic rises and sets obliquely; if the ecliptic pole lies north of the celestial pole, summer solstice is at noon, the ecliptic rises and sets vertically, and the yellow ecliptic quadrant always lies on the meridian; if the ecliptic pole lies west of the celestial pole, spring equinox is at noon, the ecliptic tilts from northeast to southwest, and the yellow ecliptic quadrant lies east of the meridian; if the ecliptic pole lies east of the celestial pole, autumn equinox is at noon, the ecliptic runs from southeast to northwest, and the yellow ecliptic quadrant lies west of the meridian. The ecliptic's orientation changes continually, so tables are built by computing the yellow ecliptic quadrant and limiting altitude for each ecliptic degree.
16
First take the Sun at the spring equinox (mansion 3°0) and find, at the first quarter after noon, the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude and limiting altitude. In the figure: A–B–C–D is the meridian (A zenith, C–D horizon, B north pole). B–C is Beijing's latitude, 39°55′. F–G–H is the equator (H on the horizon, F at noon as the equatorial midpoint; altitude F–D = 50°05′). Circle Xin–Zi–Ren carries ecliptic pole Zi; B–Zi–Ji–Chou is the polar–solstitial meridian; F–Chou–H is the ecliptic (Yin on the horizon; H autumn equinox, Chou winter solstice, F spring equinox where the Sun stands at noon, so equinox offset from noon is zero). From ecliptic pole Zi through the zenith draw meridian Zi–A–Mao — the yellow ecliptic quadrant. Chen marks the ecliptic midpoint above the horizon, east of noon — the quadrant longitude. Angle Chen–Yin–Mao is the ecliptic–horizon angle; arc Chen–Mao is the limiting altitude. Use right spherical triangle F–Chen–A for arcs F–Chen and A–Chen: right angle at Chen, side F–A = co-latitude (equal to Beijing's 39°55′). From 90° at F where the equator crosses the meridian, subtract obliquity 23°29′ (angle Ji–F–Chou) to get angle Yin–F–D = 66°31′ — the ecliptic–meridian angle; also called the angle between ecliptic and equatorial right ascension. It equals the opposite angle Chen–F–A. Proportion: radius : cos(F angle) :: tan(co-latitude F–A) : tan(quadrant offset). Table gives 18°26′14″ for arc F–Chen — ecliptic degrees of quadrant east of noon. Add to spring equinox at F (mansion 3) because the quadrant lies east of noon. Chen = mansion 3, 18°26′14″ — the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude. Second proportion: radius : sin(F angle) :: sin(co-latitude) : sin(zenith distance). Table gives A–Chen = 36°03′09″ — quadrant zenith distance. Subtract from 90° quadrant A–Mao to get Chen–Mao = 53°56′51″ — the limiting altitude opposite angle Chen–Yin–Mao.
17
First ratio: radius
18
Second ratio: cosine of angle F
19
Third ratio: tangent of arc F–A
20
Fourth ratio: tangent of arc F–Chen
21
First ratio: radius
22
Second ratio: sine of angle F
23
Third ratio: sine of arc F–A
24
Fourth ratio: sine of arc A–Chen
25
Diagram omitted
26
西 西 西 8888
Next take the Sun at the autumn equinox (mansion 9°0) and find equinox offset from noon, quadrant longitude, and limiting altitude at the first quarter after noon. With autumn equinox at noon (Wu), ecliptic G–Wei–F meets the horizon at Yin (G spring equinox, Wei summer solstice); polar meridian Zi–Yi–Wei–Ji; quadrant meridian Zi–A–Mao places Chen west of noon. First convert arc G–F (equator semicircle west of equinox) into hours as equinox offset from noon; then solve right triangle F–Chen–A (right angle at Chen, side F–A = co-latitude) for arcs F–Chen and A–Chen. From 90° at F subtract obliquity (angle Ji–F–Wei) to get angle Chen–F–A = 66°31′; arc F–Chen = 18°26′14″ east of noon in ecliptic degrees. Subtract from autumn equinox at Wu (mansion 9) because the quadrant lies west of noon. Chen = mansion 8, 11°33′46″ — the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude. Subtract arc A–Chen (36°03′09″) from the 90° quadrant A–Mao to get Chen–Mao = 53°56′51″ — the limiting altitude opposite angle Chen–Yin–Mao.
27
Next take the Sun 30° after the spring equinox (mansion 4°0) and find the yellow ecliptic quadrant quantities at the first quarter after noon. Place mansion 4°0 at noon at Xin (the Sun); ecliptic Xin–Ren–G meets the horizon at Yin. Chou winter solstice, Ren spring equinox; polar meridian B–Zi–Chou. Again from ecliptic pole Zi through zenith A draw quadrant Zi–A–Mao; Chen, the ecliptic midpoint, lies east of noon. First solve right triangle Xin–F–Ren for arcs Ren–F, Xin–F and angle Ren–Xin–F: right angle at F, angle Ren = obliquity, side Ren–Xin = 30° ecliptic arc after equinox. Proportion: radius : cos(obliquity) :: tan(ecliptic arc) : tan(equator arc). Table gives Ren–F = 27°54′10″ — equatorial co-ascension, i.e. spring equinox offset west of noon. Converted to time: 1h51′37″ — spring equinox offset from noon. Second proportion: radius : sin(obliquity) :: sin(ecliptic arc) : sin(declination). Table gives Xin–F = 11°29′33″ — Sun's north declination. Third proportion gives tan(ecliptic–meridian angle) = 69°22′51″ for angle Ren–Xin–F — the ecliptic–equator right-ascension angle. Next solve right triangle Xin–Chen–A (right angle at Chen; angle Xin equals opposite angle Ren–Xin–F) for arcs Xin–Chen and A–Chen. From co-latitude A–F subtract declination Xin–F to get A–Xin = 28°25′27″ — the Sun's zenith distance. Proportion: radius : cos(Xin angle) :: tan(zenith distance A–Xin) : tan(quadrant offset). Table gives 10°47′28″ for arc Xin–Chen — ecliptic degrees of quadrant east of noon. Add to Xin (mansion 4°0) because the quadrant lies east of noon. Chen = mansion 4, 10°47′28″ — the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude. Second proportion: radius : sin(Xin angle) :: sin(zenith distance) : sin(quadrant zenith distance). Table gives A–Chen = 26°27′20″ — quadrant zenith distance. Subtract from 90° quadrant A–Mao to get Chen–Mao = 63°32′40″ — the limiting altitude opposite angle Chen–Yin–Mao.
28
First ratio: radius
29
Second ratio: cosine of angle Ren
30
Third ratio: tangent of arc Ren–Xin
31
Fourth ratio: tangent of arc Ren–F
32
First ratio: radius
33
Second ratio: sine of angle Ren
34
Third ratio: sine of arc Ren–Xin
35
Fourth ratio: sine of arc Xin–F
36
First ratio: cosine of arc Ren–Xin
37
Second ratio: cotangent of angle Ren
38
Third ratio: radius
39
Fourth ratio: tangent of angle Xin
40
First ratio: radius
41
Second ratio: cosine of angle Xin
42
Third ratio: tangent of arc A–Xin
43
Fourth ratio: tangent of arc Xin–Chen
44
First ratio: radius
45
Second ratio: sine of angle Xin
46
Third ratio: sine of arc A–Xin
47
Fourth ratio: sine of arc A–Chen
48
西 西
Next take the Sun 30° before the autumn equinox (mansion 8°0) and find the yellow ecliptic quadrant quantities at the first quarter after noon. Place Xin (the Sun's true longitude) at noon; Shen autumn equinox lies east of noon; Ren spring equinox, Wei summer solstice; polar meridian Zi–B–Wei. From ecliptic pole Zi through the zenith draw quadrant Zi–A–Mao west of noon. Use right triangle Xin–F–Shen: right angle at F, angle Shen = obliquity, ecliptic arc Shen–Xin = 30°; equatorial co-ascension Shen–F = 27°54′10″. Subtract from semicircle Ren–Shen to get Ren–F = mansion 5, 2°05′50″ — spring equinox offset west of noon. Converted to time: 10h08′23″ — spring equinox offset from noon. Next use right triangle Xin–Chen–A (right at Chen): angle Xin and zenith distance A–Xin match the previous example. Arc Xin–Chen = 10°47′28″ — quadrant offset from noon in ecliptic degrees. Subtract from Xin (mansion 8°0) because the quadrant lies west of noon. Chen = mansion 7, 19°12′32″ — the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude. Subtract A–Chen from the 90° quadrant A–Mao to get Chen–Mao = 63°32′40″ — the limiting altitude opposite angle Chen–Yin–Mao.
49
Next take the Sun at noon 30° before equinox (mansion 2°0): Xin at noon places Ren spring equinox east of the meridian; Shen autumn equinox, Chou winter solstice; polar meridian B–Zi–Chou; quadrant Zi–A–Mao also east of noon. Use right triangle Xin–F–Ren: right angle at F, angle Ren = obliquity, ecliptic arc Ren–Xin = 30°. Arc Ren–Wu (equator) = 27°54′10″. Subtract from the full equator to get mansion 11, 2°05′50″ — equatorial degrees of equinox offset east of noon. In time that is 22h08′23″ — the equinox offset from noon. Also Xin–Wu = 11°29′33″ (Sun south of the equator), and angle Ren–Xin–Wu = 69°22′51″ — the ecliptic–equatorial right-ascension angle. Next solve right triangle Xin–Chen–A (right angle at Chen, angle at Xin): co-latitude A–Wu plus yellow-red distance Xin–Wu gives A–Xin = 51°24′33″ — the Sun's zenith distance. Proportion: radius : cos(Xin angle) :: tan(zenith distance A–Xin) : tan(quadrant offset). Table gives Xin–Chen = 23°48′40″ — ecliptic degrees of quadrant east of noon. Add to Xin at mansion 2°0 to get Chen = mansion 2, 23°48′40″ — the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude. Second proportion: radius : sin(Xin angle) :: sin(zenith distance) : sin(quadrant zenith distance). Versed-sine table gives Mao–Chen = 42°59′01″ — the limiting altitude.
50
First ratio: radius
51
Second ratio: cosine of angle Xin
52
Third ratio: tangent of arc A–Xin
53
Fourth ratio: tangent of arc Xin–Chen
54
First ratio: radius
55
Second ratio: sine of angle Xin
56
Third ratio: sine of arc A–Xin
57
Fourth ratio: sine of arc A–Chen
58
西 西 西西西
Next take the Sun at noon 30° past autumn equinox (mansion 10°0). With Xin as the Sun at noon, Shen (autumn equinox) is after the meridian and spring equinox before it; Wei is summer solstice; polar meridian Zi–Yi–Wei; quadrant Zi–A–Mao lies west of noon. Use the same right triangle Xin–Wu–Shen as Xin–Wu–Ren above; arc Shen–Wu converts to 1h51′37″ as autumn-equinox offset east of noon. Add 12 hours (half the equator) to get 13h51′37″ — the spring-equinox offset from noon. Again solve Xin–Chen–A with the same values as before; because Chen lies west of Xin, subtract Xin–Chen = 23°48′40″ from mansion 10°0 to get Chen = mansion 9, 6°11′20″ — the quadrant longitude. Chen–Mao limiting altitude = 42°59′01″ — unchanged from the earlier case. Degree-by-degree values follow the symmetric offsets before and after spring and autumn equinox; noon zenith-distance addition or subtraction depends on south versus north latitude. Quadrant-longitude addition or subtraction is determined by winter versus summer solstice. When winter solstice is west of the meridian the quadrant always lies east of noon; when summer solstice is west of the meridian it always lies west — hence the sign of the correction.
59
西 西
Now take the Sun at ecliptic longitude mansion 3, 16°44′ with applied time 8:08:19 at the second quarter of Xu; find equinox offset from noon, quadrant longitude, and limiting altitude. Ecliptic Shen–Xin–Ren–Gui meets the horizon at Yin (Ren spring equinox, Chou summer solstice, Shen autumn equinox); polar–solstitial meridian Zi–Yi–Chou–Hai. From ecliptic pole Zi through zenith A draw meridian Zi–A–Mao; Chen, the ecliptic midpoint, lies west of noon. The Sun stands at Wei after spring equinox, on the equator at Wu — counting from midnight Zi, this is the applied time. First solve right triangle Wei–Wu–Ren (right angle at Wu): obliquity 23°29′ at Ren, arc Ren–Wei = 16°44′ ecliptic after equinox; Ren–Wu = 15°24′58″ equatorial degrees after equinox. In time that is 1h01′40″; add to the time at Wu to get 21h39′59″ — spring equinox at Ren measured from midnight Zi. Subtract 12 hours to get 9h39′59″ — arc Ren–Wu, the equinox offset from noon. Next one would use triangle A–Wu–Xin, but because the equinox offset east of noon has passed the quadrant, use the Shen–Wu–Xin form instead. Find angle Xin and arcs Xin–Wu and Xin–Shen. Right angle at Wu, obliquity at Shen; arc Shen–Wu = 35°00′15″ equatorial degrees from autumn-equinox offset west of noon; Wu–Xin = 13°59′40″ — noon yellow-red distance. Angle Shen–Xin–Wu = 70°56′58″ — the ecliptic–meridian angle, i.e. the ecliptic–equatorial right-ascension angle. It equals the opposite angle A–Xin–Chen. Shen–Xin = 37°21′50″ — ecliptic degrees from autumn equinox west of noon. Subtract from autumn equinox at Shen (mansion 9) to get Xin at noon = mansion 7, 22°38′10″. Next solve right triangle A–Chen–Xin (right angle at Chen, angle Xin = ecliptic–equatorial right-ascension angle) for arcs Xin–Chen and A–Chen. Beijing co-latitude A–Wu = 39°55′ minus noon yellow-red distance Xin–Wu gives A–Xin = 25°55′20″ (ecliptic zenith distance); Xin–Chen = 9°00′53″ — quadrant longitude west of noon in ecliptic degrees. Subtract from Xin's noon longitude to get Chen = mansion 7, 13°37′17″ — quadrant longitude; A–Chen = 24°24′24″ — quadrant zenith distance. Subtract from quadrant A–Mao to get Chen–Mao = 65°35′36″ — limiting altitude above the horizon, opposite angle Chen–Yin–Mao.
60
Finding quadrant distance difference
61
西
Quadrant distance difference is the correction to the Moon's distance from the yellow ecliptic quadrant. The old method took ninety degrees as the Moon's horizon limit. The ecliptic rides the sky with a changing orientation, but the arc above the horizon is always a semicircle whose midpoint stands ninety degrees from the horizon on either side. Ninety degrees served to decide whether the Moon was above or below the horizon: beyond ninety degrees meant below and out of the reckoning — but all of this assumes the ecliptic as the frame of reference. The lunar path and ecliptic meet obliquely, however, and the Moon on the white path always carries some latitude north or south of the ecliptic. With south latitude the Moon sets early and rises late; at horizon crossing its distance from the yellow ecliptic quadrant falls short of ninety degrees; With north latitude the Moon rises early and sets late; at horizon crossing its distance from the yellow ecliptic quadrant already exceeds ninety degrees; The ninety-degree standard is therefore not a reliable basis. A correction was therefore introduced — on the same principle as the distance-from-Sun additive correction used in the five planets' visibility limits. The correction is derived from limiting altitude and lunar ecliptic latitude by right spherical triangle. The ecliptic rides the sky as it turns westward; its rise and set are now steep, now slanting, and change from hour to hour. With steep rise and set, Beijing's limiting altitude exceeds 73°; the higher the arc, the smaller the quadrant distance difference for a given lunar latitude; With oblique rise and set, Beijing's limiting altitude is only about 26°; the lower the arc, the larger the quadrant distance difference. At maximum lunar latitude the correction can exceed 10° — which is why quadrant distance difference must be tabulated. A table is therefore built for Beijing: at each yellow ecliptic quadrant altitude, the quadrant distance difference for each true lunar ecliptic latitude.
62
Given Beijing limiting altitude 34° and true lunar ecliptic latitude ±5°, find the quadrant distance difference. In the figure: A is the zenith; B–C the horizon; D the ecliptic pole; A–D–B–C the ecliptic meridian; F–G–H the ecliptic (meeting the horizon at G); F is the yellow ecliptic quadrant. Arc F–C = limiting altitude 34°, equal to ecliptic-pole zenith distance A–D; angles F–G–C and B–G–H are opposite and equal. If the Moon is at a node on the ecliptic at G on the horizon, F–G is the lunar horizon limit at 90°; beyond 90° it would lie below the horizon. Suppose the Moon lies 5° south of the ecliptic: circle Xin–Ren–Gui is a latitude parallel; at horizon crossing the Moon is at Ren (ecliptic Mao); F–Mao, the lunar horizon limit, falls short of 90°. If the Moon is 5° north of the ecliptic: circle Zi–Chou–Yin is a latitude parallel; at the horizon the Moon is at Chou (ecliptic Chen); F–Chen already exceeds 90°, so an additive correction is required. Use right spherical triangle Ji–Mao–Ren for arc Ji–Mao: right angle at Mao, angle Ji = limiting altitude, side Mao–Ren = lunar ecliptic latitude. Proportion: tan(Ji angle) : radius :: tan(Mao–Ren) : sin(quadrant distance difference). Table gives 7°42′ for arc Ji–Mao. It equals Ji–Chen because triangles Ji–Chen–Chou and Ji–Mao–Ren share angle Ji with equal latitude sides — congruent right triangles, so the two arcs must match. Quadrant distance difference Ji–Mao subtracted from 90° (F–G) gives 82°18′ for F–Mao — matching parallel Xin–Ren: the horizon limit with south latitude. Adding Ji–Chen to 90° gives 97°42′ for F–Chen — matching parallel Zi–Chou: the horizon limit with north latitude.
63
First ratio: tangent of angle Ji
64
Second ratio: radius
65
Third ratio: tangent of arc Mao–Ren
66
Fourth ratio: sine of arc Ji–Mao
67
Diagram omitted
68
Finding ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle and Moon's zenith distance
69
仿 西
The old solar-eclipse three-difference method took the yellow ecliptic quadrant as its frame. The Comprehensive Calendar front fascicle derives all three differences from the Moon, whose coordinates are white-path coordinates; the white path is tighter than the ecliptic, so the three differences were taken from lunar distance off the white ecliptic quadrant, the white-path altitude arc intersection angle, and the lunar altitude arc. The rear fascicle streamlines this: it derives the three differences from the white-path ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle and solar zenith distance, forming that angle by adding or subtracting the equatorial–white-path longitudinal intersection angle from the equatorial altitude arc intersection angle, and never computes lunar distance off the white ecliptic quadrant — saving work over the earlier method. Occultation parallax seeks apparent separation and time when star and Moon share ecliptic longitude; the three differences must therefore be fixed by the yellow ecliptic quadrant. One may follow the rear fascicle and skip the yellow ecliptic quadrant, computing the ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle directly — the supplement of the ecliptic altitude arc angle. Without comparing lunar distance off the yellow ecliptic quadrant against the horizon limit, one cannot tell whether the Moon is above or below the horizon. The intersection angle is found by first computing lunar distance west of the yellow ecliptic quadrant, quadrant altitude, and lunar distance from the ecliptic pole, then applying the rear fascicle's oblique-spherical method (originally for equatorial altitude arc intersection angle and solar zenith distance) to obtain ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle and lunar zenith distance.
70
西
Given shared ecliptic longitude 26°22′11″ in mansion Shen, Moon 43°48′56″ before the ascending node on the white path, yellow–white intersection 5°04′10″, yellow ecliptic quadrant at mansion 7, 13°37′17″, limiting altitude 65°35′36″: find true lunar latitude, ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle, and lunar zenith distance. In the figure: A is the zenith; A–B–C–D the meridian (C–D horizon, B north pole); F–G–H the equator (F noon, G west, H midnight); Mao the ecliptic pole; Xin–Ren–Gui–Zi the ecliptic (Ren spring equinox, Gui summer solstice); Wu where the ecliptic crosses the horizon. Arc Wu–Wei = 90°; Wei is the yellow ecliptic quadrant at mansion 7, 13°37′17″. Arc Wei–Chen (angle Wu) = limiting altitude 65°35′36″, equal to ecliptic-pole zenith distance A–Mao. Si–Yin–Chou is the white path (Yin = ascending node, angle Yin = yellow–white intersection 5°04′10″). Shen marks the Moon on the ecliptic at You; Shen–Yin = 43°48′56″ on the white path before the node; Shen–You = lunar ecliptic latitude. You = shared ecliptic longitude 26°22′11″ in mansion 5. Wei–You = 47°15′06″ — lunar distance west of the yellow ecliptic quadrant. Angle Wei–Mao–You: A–Shen–Xu is the altitude arc; angle Mao–Shen–A is the ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle; A–Shen is lunar zenith distance. First solve right triangle Yin–You–Shen (right angle at You, angle Yin = yellow–white intersection, Yin–Shen = lunar arc before ascending node) for Shen–You = 3°30′27″ — true latitude south of the ecliptic. Add to quadrant Mao–You to get Mao–Shen = 93°30′27″ — lunar distance from the ecliptic pole. Next use oblique triangle A–Mao–Shen: sides A–Mao = ecliptic-pole zenith distance, Shen–Mao = lunar pole distance; angle Shen–Mao–A = arc You–Wei (lunar quadrant distance). Solve for angle Shen and side A–Shen. Drop perpendicular arc A–Hai from the zenith to split the figure into right triangles A–Hai–Mao and A–Hai–Shen. First triangle A–Hai–Mao (right angle at Hai, angle Mao, side A–Mao): Mao–Hai = 56°14′15″ — polar component leg. Subtract from Shen–Mao to get Shen–Hai = 37°16′12″ — lunar component leg. Next triangle A–Hai–Shen: right angle at Hai, side Shen–Hai, plus Hai–Mao and angle Mao from the first triangle. Compound proportion gives angle Shen = 56°02′51″ — the ecliptic altitude arc intersection angle. On oblique triangle A–Mao–Shen, opposite sides and angles give A–Shen = 53°43′24″ — lunar zenith distance.
71
Diagram omitted
72
Finding lunar distance from a star and occultation apparent time
73
西 西 西
Lunar altitude above the horizon: geocentric value is true altitude, surface value is apparent altitude; the minute difference is the terrestrial-radius correction (parallax). At the horizon the Moon's zenith distance is 90° and parallax is maximal; the sine of that angle equals the local Earth radius (in the scale used). As the Moon climbs, zenith distance shrinks and parallax diminishes in proportion to the sine of instantaneous lunar zenith distance; the current altitude correction follows by proportion. Altitude displacement then splits true coordinates from apparent longitude and latitude. The difference between apparent and true longitude is the east–west correction; The difference between apparent and true latitude is the north–south correction. The three corrections are found by the rear fascicle's solar-eclipse three-difference method, using rectilinear triangles. The rear fascicle projects the sphere onto a plane in its three-difference diagram; here the sphere-on-sphere diagram is used instead. The north–south correction, applied to the Moon's true latitude, yields apparent latitude. Comparing apparent latitude with the star's latitude shows whether the Moon passes north or south of it. The east–west correction, scaled to the Moon's hourly true motion, gives the time offset between applied and observed times. Apply the east–west correction, with the proper sign for the Moon's position relative to the limit, to the occultation applied time to get the observed occultation time.
74
西 西 西 西
Using values already found for the third day of the third month, Daoguang 12 (day Guichou): occultation applied time 8:08:19 at the second quarter of Xu; ecliptic longitude altitude-arc angle 56°02′51″; lunar zenith distance 53°43′24″; maximum geocentric parallax 6′07″; Moon true latitude 3°30′27″ S; Fourth Star of Si Guai latitude 3°11′44″ S; hourly true lunar motion 36′33″. Find star–Moon separation and observed occultation time. In the figure: A = zenith; A–Wei–Chen–Si = ecliptic meridian; Chen–Wu–Si = horizon; Mao = ecliptic pole; Wei–Wu–Xin = ecliptic. Wei marks the yellow ecliptic quadrant longitude; arc Wei–Chen is the limiting altitude, equal to co-latitude A–Mao. Shen is the Moon, Zi the Fourth Star of Si Guai; both lie on the ecliptic at You. You is star and Moon ecliptic longitude; arc You–Wei = Moon's westward distance from the limit. Zi–You = 3°11′44″ S (star); Shen–You = 3°30′27″ S (Moon true latitude); Shen–Mao = lunar polar distance; A–Shen–Xu = altitude arc; Shen–A = 53°43′24″ zenith distance; angle Mao–Shen–A = 56°02′51″ (ecliptic longitude altitude-arc angle), equal to opposite angle Xu–Shen–Hai. All of these are geocentric true values. Observers stand above the geocenter, so apparent altitude is always lower than true altitude. At the horizon geocentric parallax is greatest — here 6′07″. By the rear fascicle's altitude-difference method: radius : sin(Shen–A) :: maximum geocentric parallax : present-time altitude difference. The present-time correction is 48′28″. At Shen–Huo, Huo is the Moon's apparent altitude. From Huo draw Mu parallel to the ecliptic, forming right triangle Shen–Mu–Huo. The arc is small enough to treat as rectilinear — the same principle as the rear fascicle's solar-eclipse three-difference method. Right angle at Mu; angle Shen = ecliptic longitude altitude-arc angle; side Shen–Huo = present-time altitude difference. Mu–Huo = 40′12″ (east–west correction); Shen–Mu = 27′04″ (north–south correction). Add to true latitude Shen–You to get apparent latitude Mu–You = 3°57′31″. Subtract star latitude Zi–You to get arc Zi–Mu = 45′47″ — the observer sees the Moon 45′47″ below the Fourth Star of Si Guai. Star and Moon at the same ecliptic longitude You are in conjunction by longitude. The Moon's apparent altitude is at Huo and apparent latitude at Mu; the star at Zi remains within one degree. But apparent longitude shifts from Huo to Tu on the ecliptic — at applied time the star is at You, while the Moon's apparent longitude at Tu still lies west: conjunction has not yet occurred. Tu–You equals Huo–Mu, so scale hourly true lunar motion to the east–west correction Huo–Mu to get 1h06m — the time for the Moon to cover Huo–Mu. Add to the applied time at Huo to get 10:14:19 at the first quarter of Hai — the observed time when the Moon at Mu and the star share longitude You.
75
Diagram omitted
76
Finding the Moon's distance from the limit at observed time
77
西退 退 西西
Observed-time distance from the limit exceeds applied-time distance because the apparent-longitude correction shifts the Moon and star westward with the sky, advancing or delaying conjunction. Geocentric parallax lowers the Moon's apparent altitude, so apparent longitude and latitude must differ from true longitude and latitude. From the surface south of the zenith (where the yellow ecliptic quadrant lies), apparent latitude always shifts south. If true latitude is north, apparent latitude is smaller — a subtractive correction; if true latitude is south, apparent latitude is greater — an additive correction. Star and Moon south of the ecliptic may be within one degree geocentrically yet over one degree apart to the observer; those north of the ecliptic may be over one degree apart geocentrically yet within one degree apparently. North–south separation beyond one degree lies outside the occultation limit and is excluded. The apparent-longitude correction can correspond to as much as two hours of lunar motion; in two hours the sky rotates nearly one mansion westward, so apparent longitude governs whether the Moon leads or lags. If the Moon lies west of the yellow ecliptic quadrant, apparent longitude shifts west and observed time lags applied time; if east of the quadrant, apparent longitude shifts east and observed time precedes applied time. Applied-time values may show star and Moon above the horizon when observed-time values show them below, or applied above horizon when observed still below. After finding applied time, compare the Moon's distance from the yellow ecliptic quadrant with the horizon limit to determine whether it is above or below the horizon. If distance from the limit is less than the horizon limit, the Moon is above the horizon; if greater, it is below the horizon. When distance from the limit is only slightly less than the horizon limit, applied-time star and Moon are above the horizon but observed-time values may place them below — the gap equals the sky's westward rotation over the lunar motion corresponding to the apparent-longitude correction. Use the minimum westward rotation corresponding to the true–apparent longitude difference as the apparent-longitude correction; see the lower fascicle, section on finding the horizon limit. Subtract it from the horizon limit to get the apparent horizon limit and compare with the Moon's distance from the limit. If distance from the limit is less than the horizon limit but greater than the apparent horizon limit, applied-time Moon is above the horizon but observed-time Moon is below; Knowing the observed Moon must be below the horizon, such cases are discarded. If distance from the limit is less than the apparent horizon limit, the observed Moon is above the horizon. Exceptions remain because the apparent-longitude correction uses minimum values. If one recomputes distance from the limit from the Moon's true path rather than observed time, whether it is truly above or below the horizon cannot be determined with certainty. After obtaining observed time, one must therefore examine the Moon's true latitude and applied-time distance from the limit in detail. If true latitude is south and distance from the limit exceeds 60°, or north and exceeds 70°, an applied-time distance within these bounds guarantees the observed Moon is above the horizon. In every case recompute the Moon's distance from the yellow ecliptic quadrant from observed time. If that value exceeds the horizon limit, the observed Moon is below the horizon and the case is still excluded. Only when the corrected distance falls below the horizon limit can one say that at apparent time the Moon must stand above the horizon — a claim that actual observation can confirm. That is why parallax must be derived in careful detail before it can be applied in practice.
← Previous Chapter
Back to Chapters
Next Chapter →