← Back to 明史

卷七十八 志第五十四 食貨二

Volume 78 Treatises 54: Finance and Economics 2

Chapter 78 of 明史 · History of Ming
← Previous Chapter
Chapter 78
Next Chapter →
1
調 沿
In matters of tax and corvée, the Tang practice of zu, yong, and diao still resembled the older order more closely than what followed. After Yang Yan introduced the two-tax system, its simplicity and ease of administration won lasting adoption; dynasty after dynasty kept it, and the Ming did not alter it. While the Founding Emperor was still King of Wu, he levied taxes at one tenth, and apportioned corvée labor according to holdings in land. Counties ranked upper, middle, or lower based on whether their registered levies fell below one hundred thousand, sixty thousand, or thirty thousand dan. Prefectures likewise fell into three grades, keyed to whether their levies stood above or below two hundred thousand dan, or below one hundred thousand. Soon after his enthronement he codified tax and corvée law, with the yellow registers as the sole authority. The registers listed household males and land: males bore corvée duty, land bore grain rent. Land tax came in two forms: summer tax and autumn grain. Summer tax had to be paid by the eighth month at latest; autumn grain by the second month of the new year. Household males were classified as adults or minors—two grades in all. Newborns were registered as minors; at sixteen they became liable adults. Adults performed corvée until age sixty, when they were released from duty. Certain officeholders enjoyed corvée exemptions. Duties fell into three kinds: li-jia service, equalized corvée, and miscellaneous levies. Household-based duties were jia service; male-based duties were yao corvée; extraordinary imperial orders were miscellaneous corvée. Each category could be fulfilled by labor or by hired substitutes. Prefectures, subprefectures, and counties checked registers for household size and wealth, then apportioned burdens to match each taxpayer's capacity.
2
綿綿 西西
Under the two-tax system in the Hongwu reign, summer tax was paid in grain, paper notes, or silk. Autumn grain likewise could be paid in rice, paper notes, or silk. By the Hongzhi reign the summer-tax ledger had grown elaborate: grain and wheat in several grades, chaff, silk floss and waste silk, tax silk, floss and tax silk commuted to fabric, silk paid in kind, farm-mulberry silk and loose ends, per-capita silk, reclassified silk, cotton and ramie commuted to cloth, native ramie, safflower, hemp cloth, various paper notes, small silk at original quotas, currency silk, and commuted silk of every description. Autumn grain entries likewise multiplied: rice, rent and lease notes, mountain-rent notes, rent silk and fabric, coarse hemp and course cotton, ramie cloth, ox-rent grain, cotton floss by the mu, jujube levies commuted to rice, ramie and hemp courses, cotton cloth, fish levies, and reclassified silk—all reckoned against the autumn quota. Under Wanli the categories shifted slightly, but grain remained primary and silk and paper notes secondary. Summer tax in rice applied chiefly to Jiangxi, Huguang, Guangdong, and Guangxi; wheat and chaff chiefly to Guizhou; farm-mulberry silk nearly everywhere except Sichuan, Guang, Yunnan, and Guizhou; other items followed local production.
3
As soon as the dynasty was founded, the Taizu ordered that holdings of five to ten mu plant half a mu each of mulberry, hemp, and cotton, and holdings above ten mu plant double that amount. The levy was eight taels of hemp per mu and four taels of cotton per mu. Mulberry plots began to bear tax after four years. Households that failed to plant mulberry paid one bolt of silk instead. Failure to plant hemp or cotton required payment of one bolt of hemp cloth and one bolt of cotton cloth. Such were the origins of the farm-mulberry silk and fabric levies.
4
使 西
In Hongwu year 9 the court allowed taxpayers nationwide to remit grain taxes in silver, paper notes, cash, or silk. One tael of silver, one thousand cash, or one string of notes each commuted to one dan of rice; wheat was valued at twenty percent less. A bolt of cotton or ramie cloth counted as six dou of rice or seven dou of wheat. A bolt of hemp cloth commuted to four dou of rice or five dou of wheat. Silk and fabric conversions varied by weight, and those who preferred to pay grain directly were allowed to do so. In year 17 Yunnan was permitted to pay autumn rent in gold, silver, cowries, cloth, lacquer, cinnabar, and mercury. Hence rice and wheat paid in kind were called ben payment, and all commuted dues were called zhe payment. Two years later Vice Minister Yang Jing audited granary stocks empire-wide: wherever stores exceeded two years' supply, commuted payment was accepted; only northern commissions feeding the frontier still required grain in kind. In year 30 he told the Ministry of Revenue: "The traveling clerk Gao Zhi reports that Shaanxi is crushed by tax arrears. Consider allowing all rent arrears from before year 28 to be settled in local products—cloth, silk, cotton, gold, silver, and the like—and codify this as law." The ministry then set commutation rates: one ingot of paper notes for one dan of rice; one tael of gold for ten dan; one tael of silver for two dan; one bolt of silk for one dan and two dou; one bolt of cotton cloth for one dan; one bolt of ramie cloth for seven dou; one jin of raw cotton for two dou. The emperor said: "Commuting arrears is meant to ease the people's hardship. Rates this heavy will only crush them further. Is this what compassion looks like? He doubled the grain equivalent for each tael of gold and silver. Paper notes were set at two strings and five hundred cash per dan. Everything else followed the original proposal."
5
After Yongle conquered Jiaozhi, rent and tax there were paid in silk, lacquer, sappanwood, kingfisher feathers, paper fans, and assorted aromatics including aloes, sandalwood, and benzoin. When the Li of Qiongzhou and the Yao of Zhaoqing in Guangdong submitted, their tax obligations matched those of the interior. Empire-wide grain tax in kind exceeded thirty million dan; silk, notes, and commuted dues totaled more than twenty million units. The realm was prosperous and revenues abundant. Besides the millions of dan shipped to the capital, prefectural and county granaries overflowed until grain rotted red and inedible. In lean years officials often distributed relief grain and seed loans first and reported to the throne afterward. Though annual silver tribute exceeded three hundred thousand taels, private silver trade among the people remained strictly forbidden.
6
簿 西
When the Taizu first set land tax empire-wide, official land paid five sheng three he five shao per mu, civilian land two sheng less, heavy-rent land eight sheng five he five shao, and confiscated official land one dou two sheng. Suzhou, Songjiang, Jiaxing, and Huzhou alone were punished for holding out for Zhang Shicheng: elite and wealthy holdings were registered as official land and taxed at private-rent rates recorded in ledgers. Minister of Agriculture Yang Xian then doubled per-mu rates across western Zhejiang on grounds of its exceptional fertility.
7
西 西 西使 使
Western Zhejiang's official and civilian rates thus ran several times higher than elsewhere, with per-mu levies reaching two or three dan. Suzhou bore the heaviest burden, followed by Songjiang, Jiaxing, and Huzhou, then Changzhou and Hangzhou. In Hongwu year 13 the ministry trimmed quotas: rates from seven dou five sheng down to four dou four sheng were cut twenty percent; from four dou three sheng down to three dou six sheng were capped at three dou five sheng; lower rates stayed unchanged. Even after trimming, Suzhou prefecture alone owed more than 2.74 million dan of autumn grain—only 150,000 dan of it civilian tax, the rest official-field rent. Suzhou's official-grain quota alone matched all of Zhejiang province—such was the burden's scale. In Jianwen year 2 an edict declared: "Jiang and Zhe taxes are uniquely heavy; Suzhou and Songjiang were assessed at private-rent rates only to punish those who had resisted. Such punishment cannot become a permanent rule that crushes a whole region. Reduce and exempt them all; no holding may be taxed above one dou per mu." Chengzu reversed Jianwen's reforms, and western Zhejiang's taxes grew heavy again. Soon after Xuanzong's accession, Guangxi commissioner Zhou Gan reported after touring Suzhou, Changzhou, Jiaxing, and Huzhou: "Mass flight afflicts these prefectures. Elders unanimously blame crushing tax burdens. In Wujiang and Kunshan civilian land once paid five sheng per mu, but tenants on wealthy landlords' fields paid private rent of one dan per mu. When such land later passed to the state, officials collected the full private-rent rate. Eight parts in ten already broke them—what if the state took everything? Full extraction would leave them freezing and starving; flight would be inevitable. At Renhe, Haining, and Kunshan seawater had swallowed more than 1,900 qing of official and civilian land, yet rent was still collected after more than ten years. When fields lie beneath the sea, whence can rent come? Please assess confiscated official land and land returned from noble estates at the local official-field rate of six dou per mu. Exempt all seawater-lost fields entirely, and wasteland will cease while commoners may live in peace." The emperor ordered the ministries to deliberate and carry this out. In Xuande year 5, month 2, an edict ordered: official-field rent at one to four dou per mu was cut twenty percent; from four dou one sheng up to one dan or more, thirty percent. This was codified as law." Grand Coordinator Zhou Chen and Suzhou Prefect Kuang Zhong then engineered further cuts of more than 700,000 dan for Suzhou and proportional relief elsewhere, easing the southeast somewhat. Zhou Chen also tried to assess Songjiang official land at civilian rates; the Ministry of Revenue impeached him for overturning established law. Xuanzong declined to punish him but could not approve the change. The court meanwhile issued repeated edicts remitting rent and tax. Revenue officials privately warned local magistrates not to cite imperial remissions as grounds for reduction. The emperor told Minister Hu Ying that revenue planners were blocking imperial relief, yet he did not punish them severely. In Zhengtong 1 official land in Suzhou, Songjiang, Zhejiang, and elsewhere was reassessed like civilian land: autumn rates from four dou one sheng up to two dan or more were cut to three dou; from two dou one sheng to four dou, to two dou; from one dou one sheng to two dou, to one dou. By late Xuande Suzhou's grain arrears had reached 7.9 million dan and the people were at breaking point. Only then did they gain a little relief. Early in Yingzong's restoration, Minister Sun Yuanzhen guarding Zhejiang was told to set rates for Hangzhou, Jiaxing, and Huzhou so that heavily assessed land paid less grain per nominal dan and lightly assessed land paid more. They ruled that where official land was assessed below one dan per mu or civilian land below seven dou, each nominal dan owed 1.3 dan of evened grain annually; where either was assessed below four dou per mu, each nominal dan owed 1.5 dan; where official land was below two dou per mu or civilian below two dou seven sheng, each nominal dan owed 1.7 dan; where official land was below eight sheng per mu or civilian below seven sheng, each nominal dan owed 2.2 dan. Heavy assessments were eased and light ones weighted to equalize burdens—yet the nominal per-mu rate of one dan was never actually reduced.
8
滿
In Jiajing year 2 Censor Li Guan reported: "At the dynasty's founding summer and autumn taxes included more than 4.7 million dan of wheat; today we are short 90,000; rice stood above 24.7 million dan; today we are short more than 2.5 million. Yet the swelling imperial clan, redundant officials, growing eunuch establishment, and expanding armies all draw on the same revenues. Revenues shrink daily while expenditures grow daily. Audit the founding tax quotas against current spending item by item, and the court will see revenues are finite and waste cannot go unchecked." The ministry replied: officials seeking promotion must prove rent and tax were fully collected and remitted during their term before receiving credentials to leave office. We also beg the throne to practice frugality personally and lead the empire by example." The emperor approved the proposal. Soon afterward Instructor Gu Dingchen submitted four reforms targeting chronic abuses in tax collection:
9
仿 便 便 使
First, audit and regularize the original land-tax quotas. Hold county magistrates accountable: in slack farming seasons have li-jia compile fish-scale registers like those of Hongwu and Zhengtong, listing original quotas, plot markers, rate codes, sections, wasteland, and mature acreage; officials should resurvey boundaries, measure field by field, and report reclamation, corrections, and exemptions. Print the registers, store copies in government archives, distribute them to villages, and use them as the permanent basis for audit. Adopt the workable precedents of former coordinators Zhou Chen and Wang Shu as standing rules. Once annual totals for actual collection, transport, reserves, surcharges, in-kind and commuted payments, supplements, temporary and attached levies are fixed, post public notices so everyone knows what is owed. Then clerks cannot practice fraud, and commoners will escape chained liability and harassing exactions. Second, reform the collection of annual taxes and grain. Before the Chenghua and Hongzhi reigns, li-jia pressed collection, grain households paid up, grain chiefs received and forwarded payment, and magistrates supervised receipt on the spot. Grain chiefs dared not pad measures, households dared not adulterate grain, and transport troops dared not obstruct delivery or demand extras—public and private interests alike were served. Lately magistrates no longer track which li-jia and households actually owe grain, but simply set deadlines, beat grain chiefs, and send them into the countryside to squeeze payment. The powerful collected double with oversized measures and extorted on every pretext, leaving villages stripped bare. The weak were bullied by local strongmen, delayed payment, and were forced to sell property to make up arrears. Old appointees' embezzled arrears were charged to new ones; one defaulter's kin were implicated, and hundreds of innocents died under the rod or in prison. Formerly each district had at most a chief and deputy grain chief; now there are often more than ten. In practice little grain was actually collected and accounted for, while exactions, markups, and customary fees consumed far more. In a single year a county could ruin a hundred middling households—the harm was immense. The Ministry of Revenue should codify precedents, transmit them to local offices, and ensure grain chiefs are appointed strictly under the old rules. Magistrates who appoint too many grain chiefs, let them run wild in the villages, or torture grain chiefs instead of using li-jia for collection should be punished. Those responsible for numerous deaths should be prosecuted accordingly.
10
The second and third proposals concerned dispatching officials to oversee collection and restoring reserve-granary stocks. When the memorial reached the ministries, Revenue replied: "These proposals address urgent abuses; local offices should implement them." Yet years passed and nothing changed.
11
Grain chiefs were originally wealthy landowners appointed under the Taizu to supervise local tax collection. Each July magistrates escorted them to the capital to receive transport credentials. Districts delivering ten thousand dan had one chief and one deputy; timely delivery earned an imperial audience, and articulate chiefs were often promoted. Later the rule was fixed at two rotating appointees per district. Under Xuande the posts again became permanent appointments. Exactions ran wild, harming the people, and some sold official grain privately for profit. Dismissed chiefs who had shorted public revenue faced ruin of life and family when exposed. Under Jingtai the post was abolished, then soon restored. Once military transport replaced delivery to the capital, grain chiefs remained locally and caused great harm—hence Dingchen's critique.
12
便
Soon Censor Guo Honghua and others urged empire-wide land measurement to end blanket liability and land-concealment abuses. The emperor feared disruption and refused. Supervising Secretary Xu Junmin said: "Today's land tax includes official fields—land held from the state with annual rent. Fields submerged by river overflow are called collapsed-river land. Where population fled and fields lay abandoned but quotas remained are called incident wasteland. Poor tenants on official land pay three dou per mu, sometimes five or six dou, sometimes more than a dan. Li-jia must cover phantom quotas on collapsed-river and incident land—sometimes dozens or even hundreds of dan. Civilian land costs ten times official land, yet the poor cannot afford even official plots. Official-field rates are heavy and collectors always press for the maximum; add phantom quotas and apportioned liability, with relentless pursuit and beating, and the people know no peace year-round. Meanwhile wealthy schemers and crafty clerks use false registration and shifting to merge light assessments with heavy ones. Such is the common people's suffering and the withering of neighborhoods—hence misery grows daily. Establish systems for equalized grain assessment and land limits. Exempt all collapsed-river and incident phantom quotas entirely. Merge official and civilian land into one register, assess by upper, middle, and lower rates, and equalize grain burdens. Cap wealthy holdings at one thousand mu, allow one hundred mu for subsistence, and levy surplus land at frontier rates. Then scale would be regulated, burdens balanced, rich and poor at peace, and both state and people satisfied." The ministry replied that customs differ by region and local offices should weigh what works." Nothing was done.
13
沿
Years later, on Yingtian coordinator Hou Wei's memorial, more than 90,000 dan of Suzhou seawater-lost grain was exempted, but shifting and scattered-allocation abuses persisted. In year 18, now Grand Secretary, Dingchen again reported: "The seven prefectures of Suzhou, Songjiang, Changzhou, Zhenjiang, Jiaxing, Huzhou, and Hangzhou lead the empire in tax supply, yet li clerks and local elites abuse the system worst of all. Every concealed or wasteland holding should be audited and corrected." Yingtian coordinator Ouyang Duo then surveyed more than 4,000 qing of wasteland worth over 110,000 dan, offset it with 60,000 dan of concealed holdings, and sought exemption for the rest. The Ministry of Revenue still refused to approve. Jiaxing Prefect Zhao Ying then proposed: "Do not distinguish official and civilian land or rate grades—levy all fields from three dou per mu." Duo and Suzhou Prefect Wang Yi then pooled all official and civilian holdings and balanced increases against decreases. They measured field by field and fixed graded rates. Their land-tax register fixed grain dues in eight steps: trace original quotas; remove incident phantom amounts; itemize categories; reconcile true totals; assign transport; allocate surpluses to reserves; audit retained balances; and set the single levy quota. Li-jia accounts were audited in eight categories: population and land; celebrations; sacrifices; village feasts; examination congratulations; relief; public expenses; and reserves. Equalized corvée was set in three forms: silver, labor, and horse service. These rules were codified as precedent.
14
The single levy pooled all silver and grain dues and spread them evenly per mu. The heaviest and lightest assessments were slightly adjusted through transport surcharges. Heavy assessments could not be fully cut; transport-loss grain was reduced stepwise and light commuted deductions were assigned to ease them covertly. Light assessments could not be openly raised; in-kind collection and multiplied transport-loss surcharges covertly increased their burden. Under pushed collection, land was the base and households the derivative unit. Powerful locals mostly blocked the reform, but Dingchen alone endorsed it: "If this law takes effect, my family will pay a thousand dan more, yet the poor will pay a thousand dan less—it must not be changed." Yet the throne could not cut statutory quotas, and local officials improvised as they saw fit. Official land was no longer excessively burdened, but civilian land taxes actually rose.
15
Methods such as gang silver and the one-string-of-bells system also appeared. Gang silver pooled annual corvée expenses, assessed four-tenths by household males and six-tenths by grain, simple and unified like the rope of a net. The one-string-of-bells system collected dues in bulk and then divided them. Thereafter popular payments were accepted only in kind or commuted silver.
16
At that time annual revenue to the Grand Storehouse exceeded two million taels. The old rule spent seven-tenths on routine expenses and reserved three-tenths against war and famine. In Shizong's middle years frontier costs soared, construction and ritual spending left scarcely a month without expense, and the treasury was drained. The Minister of Revenue tried every expedient—even selling temple land and selling military pardons—yet still could not cover costs. In year 29 Altan raided the capital region; troop increases and new garrisons more than doubled ration costs. In year 30 capital and frontier spending reached 5.95 million taels; Minister Sun Yingkui, despairing of alternatives, proposed raising taxes in the southern capital region and Zhejiang by 1.2 million taels—thus began supplementary levies.
17
殿 便
Thereafter capital and frontier spending ranged from over five million to more than three million taels, while annual income could not cover half of outlays. The budget office then resorted to every expedient: rake levies, labeled surcharges, confiscations and redemption sales, deed taxes, converting civilians to corvée, ti-bian, equalized corvée, and expanded precedent purchases. At first these measures relieved shortages, but over time each source yielded less. Meanwhile troubles multiplied everywhere and local officials sought retention or exemption: Zhejiang and Zhili for anti-pirate defense, Sichuan and Guizhou for timber, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Xuanfu, and Datong for war and famine. Not only were wartime exactions suspended, but even the two-million-tael annual quota fell short by a third. Yet inner-court rewards and ritual construction continued; a midnight slip from the palace had to be fulfilled at once, no matter how pressed the clerks were. In year 37, when Datong Right Guard raised alarm, only 70,000 taels entered the Grand Storehouse and total reserves fell below 100,000. Minister Fang Dun and others, desperate, seized an opportunity to report the empty treasury and submit seven expedient proposals. He then ordered ministers to submit fiscal proposals; twenty-nine were debated for implementation, most trivial and unworthy of state policy. Yet arrears from prior years were relentlessly pursued, and southern in-kind arrears were collected as commuted silver.
18
The southeast then suffered pirate raids; the southern capital region, Zhejiang, and Fujian faced extra ti-bian levies, Jiangnan alone reaching 400,000 taels. Ti-bian was simply another name for supplementary levy. Silver and labor corvée were assessed across ten jia; if one jia fell short, the next was tapped to make up the deficit—hence ti-bian, "drawing on the next jia." After the pirate threat eased, Yingtian coordinator Zhou Rudou sought cuts to supplementary levies; Supervising Secretary He Kun reported the southern capital region's exhaustion: "Troop maintenance, Works Ministry materials, Yangzi defense recruitment, circuit militia, and county levies all burden the people—sometimes one category becomes ten. Abolish these abuses." The court followed He's proposal in principle, but ti-bian quotas could not be cut.
19
Under Longqing and Wanli, supplementary quotas persisted, irregular exactions multiplied, arrears mounted, and evasion grew ever more sophisticated. Delivered grain could remain overdue for more than ten years; uncollected dues were reported as received—single counties showed false receipts of 100,000 taels. Arrears ran to hundreds of thousands per county. Fortunately the single-whip law was enforced, other exactions were curbed, and popular strength was not utterly broken.
20
便
The single-whip law pooled a prefecture or county's taxes and corvée, assessed land and household males, and required all grain and labor dues to be paid to the state. Annual corvée was hired by the government. Labor corvée was commuted by calculating wages and rations, adjusted up or down as needed; silver corvée by calculating delivery costs plus transport surcharges. Quota assignments, dispatched duties, capital needs, local reserves, supply costs, and tribute goods were merged into one levy, assessed per mu in silver and remitted to officials—hence the single whip. The law was notably simpler to administer. Under Jiajing it was tried and suspended repeatedly; full empire-wide implementation came only in Wanli year 9.
21
Three major wartime surcharges followed in succession, each lifted when the crisis ended. In year 46 Liaodong military funds were suddenly raised by three million taels. The inner treasury was full, yet the emperor refused to release funds. Minister Li Ruhua cited anti-pirate and Bozhou precedents and added 3.5 li per mu, raising empire-wide taxes by more than two million taels. The following year another 3.5 li per mu was added. The next year, at the request of War and Works, another 2 li was added. The nine li combined raised taxes by 5.2 million taels, which became the new annual quota. Only the eight capital-region prefectures and Guizhou were exempt.
22
西 便
In Tianqi 1 Supervising Secretary Zhen Shu said: "Supplementary Liaodong levies easily produce unfair distribution. Households, males, and land each carry their own silver assessments; officials collect them into a total silver quota. Assessing surcharges against the silver quota ensures nothing is missed. People across the realm differ in hardship; cloth, grain, and labor dues are collected differently by region. Only local magistrates know local conditions and can adjust collection flexibly. Following local conditions avoids one-sided hardship. The method takes the silver quota as its base, accommodates local custom, and is promulgated to the provinces. Annual retained and forwarded silver is apportioned by silver quota against the added military funds, pooled and discounted from rich to poor districts, without falling short of the ration total. Commoners would understand easily, and clerks could no longer manipulate assessments at will. Worst of all is grain tax without land and male tax without grain: when land is sold to the rich, the quota remains but the seller still owes male tax. Balance quota grain and quota males so that a given grain assessment carries a fixed number of males. When land is sold, grain and male quotas transfer together; county registers stay accurate, the poor avoid chained liability, and magistrates escape arrears." The ministry approved and implemented the proposal.
23
In Chongzhen year 3, as war resumed, Minister of War Liang Tingdong sought a land-tax increase. Minister Bi Ziyan could not stop it and added another 3 li per mu atop the existing 9 li. Only Shuntian and Yongping, recently ravaged by war, were exempt; the other six prefectures paid 6 li per mu—half the provincial rate—raising taxes by more than 1.654 million taels. Five years later Grand Coordinator Lu Xiangsheng proposed a ten-percent surcharge on official-household land tax and on civilian taxes above ten taels. Soon a flat levy of one cash per tael was imposed, called aid-rations. Two years later equalized transport was restored: grain paid military funds at six he per mu, one dan commuted to eight qian silver, plus another 1.49 fen per mu. Two years later, under Yang Sichang's command, training-ration silver of one fen per mu was added. War Ministry secretary Zhang Ruoqi proposed seizing war-abandoned land as official estates graded upper, middle, and lower, with rent from eight to two or three dou per mu. Censor Wei Zhouyin said: "Yang Sichang's policies poison the realm; suppression and training funds exceed seven million—popular resentment knows no bounds." Censor Hao Jin added: "At the end of Wanli the nine frontiers together received only 2.8 million taels. Now supplementary Liaodong funds reach nine million. Suppression funds of 3.3 million had been suspended, then training funds of more than 7.3 million were added. When in history was twenty million raked in for the capital in one year, then another twenty million from the capital sent to the frontier?" Though blunt, the memorial could not be heeded in a crisis.
24
西 便
Corvée law was codified in Hongwu 1. One qing of land owed one adult laborer; smaller holdings were grouped to meet the quota—called equalized labor. Registers of equalized labor were soon compiled for Yingtian's eighteen prefectures and for Jiujiang, Raozhou, and Nankang in Jiangxi. Each year in the farming slack season they served thirty days in the capital and returned home. Where land exceeded available males, tenants served as laborers while landowners paid one dan of grain for their support. Where labor was hired by the mu rather than through tenants, each mu paid two sheng five he of grain. When the yellow registers were completed, 110 households formed one li, subdivided into ten jia as li-jia units. Households ranked upper, middle, or lower; corvée rotated every five years and registers were renewed every ten. Annual miscellaneous duties were sequenced and equalized, payable in silver or labor as convenient—equalized corvée. Other miscellaneous corvée duties followed. Attendants, runners, and bow troops were recruited from townspeople, not grain-tax households. Extra levies of even one cash or one laborer beyond quota were punishable by exile.
25
調 西仿
Later enforcement slackened: corvée compilers favored large households and squeezed small ones. Critics noted two approaches to equalized corvée: assess by registered males and grain with wealth as the standard, or rank households by stored assets. Following registers let wealthy merchants escape corvée while natives suffered; ranking households let officials and li clerks manipulate assessments, crushing commoners further. Both approaches failed. Focusing solely on males and grain might approximate the Tang zu-yong-diao system. Officials then substituted old labor and silver corvée totals for male-and-grain counts, balancing light and heavy burdens. Corvée rotated by due turn; li-jia not on rest leave were sequenced by male-and-grain burden in the rat-tail register and levied in order. Wealthy townsmen and merchants without land could register voluntarily to help meet silver corvée quotas. Early in Zhengtong Commissioner Xia Shi pioneered the reform in Jiangxi; other provinces followed, and corvée burdens eased somewhat.
26
貿
Later court supplies were disbursed by officials, but local government needs were again funded from submitted silver given to ward and li chiefs to arrange. They received perhaps one or two tenths of what was required, sometimes ten or a hundred times as much, sometimes nothing—li-jia were charged the full cost of attendants, runners, horses, and food, and were ruined. Under equalized corvée, forwarding households supplying the capital faced capital corvée; chief deliverers were obstructed by eunuchs, commuted payment was difficult, and repeated commodity exchanges usually ruined families. Other corvée abuses of harsh exaction are too numerous to list.
27
Early Ming orders fixed local tribute quotas and excluded rare curios and luxuries. When items were needed, li-jia were assigned to buy them with silver on the market. Yet the categories were fragmented, giving the cunning room for profit. Major construction and shrine rituals multiplied expenditures without end. By mid-dynasty pirate raids and annual river floods exhausted state finances. Li-jia and equalized corvée then exceeded annual quotas.
28
調
Beyond regular li-jia duties, standing corvée included grain chiefs, forwarding households, boat heads, inn attendants, runners, bow troops, runners in black, gate guards, and kitchen stewards. Later came woodcutting, firewood hauling, river and granary repair, material transport, relay service, courier stations, and shallow-water labor—recruited as needs arose and increasing yearly. After Jiajing and Longqing the single-whip law totaled each province's males and grain and spread corvée evenly province-wide. Equalized corvée, li-jia, and the two taxes merged; commoners were less harassed and collection was easier. Yet grain chiefs and li chiefs survived in practice; when duties arose, peasants were conscripted again. After more than ten years the single-whip regulations fell into disorder and were no longer fully observed. Under Tianqi Censor Li Yingsheng listed ten abuses; three addressed horse grooms, river corvée, grain jia, repair duties, and unauthorized white corvée harassing the people. In Chongzhen year 3 Henan coordinator Fan Jingwen said: "Nothing afflicts the people like dispatched corvée. Money and grain had collecting and forwarding households; courier relay had horse households; supplies had broker households—all recruited from powerful families called great households. In practice those recruited were not the truly wealthy; middling households were often ruined. The single-whip law spread duties across local grain and should have eased burdens, yet people still ran themselves ragged yearly paying subsidies—the whip was enforced but great-household abuses were never abolished." Supervising Secretary Liu Mao then memorialized to cut courier staff, but requisitions still fell on registered households. Courier laborers went unfed until, it is said, they joined bandits in rebellion.
29
Military, artisan, and salt-maker households all served hereditary corvée. When military households lost members through death or flight, replacements were traced from original registers. Artisan households fell into two grades: resident and rotating shift. Resident artisans worked ten days a month. Those who skipped shifts paid six qian monthly in lieu—called shift payment. Eunuchs in supervisory bureaus seized artisans, conscripted juveniles by the thousands, and traced replacements as with military households when they died or fled. Salt-maker households ranked upper, middle, or lower. Each principal male was supplemented by additional males. Upper and middle households with many males might attach two or three supplements; lower households were generally exempted. Others—tomb, garden, sea, and temple households, banner bearers, treasury laborers—were too numerous to list.
30
殿 殿 西 西 殿 殿 殿 調
Early Ming labor corvée was immense: building capitals, temples, palaces, gates, and princely mansions, cutting timber, making bricks and tiles, and employing artisans by the tens of thousands. Everywhere cities were built and moats dredged—a hundred kinds of corvée at once. Through Hongwu and Xuande suburban altars and granaries were still unfinished. Under Zhengtong and Tianshun the three main halls, two palaces, southern inner quarters, and detached palaces were built one after another. Under Hongzhi Grand Secretary Liu Ji said: "Recent projects all conscript capital-garrison troops, while officers are barred from controlling how much labor is actually used. Projects needing five thousand men were reported as requiring ten or twenty thousand, with no audit." Minister of Rites Ni Yue added: "Corvée costs routinely reach hundreds of thousands; floods and droughts persist—please suspend some projects." Nanjing Minister of Rites Tong Xuan again described the suffering caused by labor corvée. Minister of Personnel Lin Han also said: "The two capital regions suffer famine year after year, crushed by countless corvées, sunk in poverty, resentment, and despair. Shanxi and Shaanxi feed military campaigns; Yunnan, Guangdong, and Guangxi mobilize against rebels. Shandong, Henan, Huguang, Sichuan, and Jiangxi build princely mansions beyond their means. Zhejiang and Fujian supply materials in greater amounts than before. Treasury stores are empty—this cannot be ignored." The emperor accepted their advice but could not follow it fully. Under Wuzong work on the Palace of Heavenly Purity was especially heavy. The Hall of Great Simplicity, first built plainly, was rebuilt in ornate style at a cost of more than twenty million taels, employing over three thousand artisans and thirteen thousand dan of grain rations yearly. The halls Ningcui, Zhaohe, Chongzhi, and Guangji, the Imperial Horse Stables, Bell and Drum Office, new Leopard Quarters buildings in the southern city, and the gunpowder depot were all rebuilt anew. For favored eunuchs' estates, shrines, tombs, and temples, the Works Ministry embezzled official funds to curry favor. Supervising Secretary Zhang Yuan said: "Artisans support families, rostered soldiers defend the frontier, and capital troops guard the throne—why leave the people destitute, ranks unfilled, profits in private hands, and public resentment mounting?" When the memorial arrived, he was demoted to a courier post in Guizhou. Shizong's construction was heaviest; before year 15 it was called austerity, yet costs already reached six or seven million taels. Costs then rose more than tenfold as fasting palaces and secret halls sprang up together. Twenty or thirty workshops employed tens of thousands of artisans at an annual cost of two or three million taels. When the ancestral temple and Wanshou Palace burned, the emperor took no heed and pressed construction harder. When funds ran short, officials and commoners were told to contribute; contributions continued, and purchase offices were opened again. Burden on the people and waste of wealth exceeded Wuzong's reign. After Wanli construction and imperial workshops exceeded regulations several times over; with requisitions and mining, the people knew no rest. When eunuchs dominated politics, they built mansions and tombs beyond their rank, and private merit shrines spread empire-wide. For more than two centuries popular strength had been exhausted. Officeholders enjoying corvée exemption ranged from one or two males to as many as sixteen. Under Wanli some exemptions covered two or three thousand mu.
31
竿
Tax exemptions took two forms: grace remissions and disaster remissions. The Taizu ruled that flood or drought anywhere brought immediate tax exemption; even in good years the poor on marginal land received preferential relief. In disaster years both taxes were fully remitted, grain was loaned, and in severe cases grain, cloth, or notes were granted outright. Reserve granaries were established, with elders exchanging notes for grain to build stores. When Jing and Qi flooded, Revenue section chief Zhao Gan was sent to relieve distress but delayed half a year and was executed in the emperor's anger. When Qingzhou suffered drought and locusts, officials who failed to report it were arrested and punished. In drought-stricken districts, if officials failed to report, elders could appeal and officials faced capital punishment. When Xiaogan starved, its magistrate sought reserve-granary relief; the emperor sent a courier at once and told Revenue: "From now on, in famine years disburse granary grain first and report afterward"—codified as law." In thirty years on the throne he granted millions in cloth and notes, more than a million dan of grain, and remitted taxes beyond counting. When Chengzu learned Henan was starving but officials had concealed it, he summoned and rebuked them. He ordered Censor-in-Chief Chen Ying to post notices empire-wide: officials who failed to report flood, drought, or disaster would not be pardoned. He also ordered annual inspection tours: officials who witnessed hardship and remained silent were imprisoned. While supervising the state, Renzong heard a request to issue relief and sent word: "Soldiers and civilians starve and cry for food—will you only memorialize and wait? Cannot you act like Han's Ji An?" Under Xuanzong the Ministry of Revenue asked to verify famine victims. The emperor said: "When people starve, relief should be like saving someone from drowning or fire—why wait for an investigation?" Under the two founders, Renzong, and Xuanzong, benevolent policies were pursued vigorously. Besides reserve granaries, grain destined for transport was diverted and inner-treasury funds granted. Where disaster areas lacked stores, neighboring counties' grain was released for relief. When locust nymphs first appeared, officials were sent to destroy them at once. Those who sold children were redeemed by the state. The wealthy were ordered to remit tenants' rent. Wealthy households loaned grain to the poor, accepting exemption from miscellaneous corvée as interest, repayable in good years. Imperial estates and lakes were opened for public gathering. Famine refugees returning home received ration grain. Grain from capital and Tongzhou granaries was sold at fair prices. Salary grain was advanced to curb prices; lodging was built for refugees; grain funded adoption of abandoned infants; poorhouses registered the needy; the unregistered were sheltered at the Candle and Banner-Pole temples. Such was their care for the people. Shizong and Shenzong neglected civilian welfare, yet when disaster reports arrived they still granted remissions and relief, not daring to break ancestral precedent.
32
Early Ming relief grain: six dou for adults, three for children, none under age five. After Yongle the amounts were reduced.
33
Under Jingdi, grain payment for relief and crime redemption required sixty dan for miscellaneous capital crimes, with exile and penal servitude reduced by one-third and lesser offenses reduced proportionally. Purchase-by-contribution precedents began under Xianzong. Students contributing one hundred dan or more of grain entered the Imperial Academy; soldiers and civilians paying 250 dan received ninth-rank honorary office; each additional 50 dan raised two grades, up to seventh rank. Under Wuzong wealthy donors of relief grain: 1,000 dan or more earned honored gates; 900 down to 200–300 dan earned honorary office up to vice sixth rank. Shizong granted cap and belt to donors of twenty dan; larger donors received seventh-rank office; at five hundred dan magistrates erected commemorative arches.
34
Relief porridge distribution began under Shizong.
35
Disaster reporting under Hongwu had no time limit. Under Hongzhi deadlines were set: summer disasters by end of month 5, autumn disasters by end of month 9. Under Wanli nearby regions used months 5 and 7, frontier regions months 7 and 9.
36
Under Hongwu, once disasters were verified, taxes were fully remitted. Under Hongzhi total disaster brought seventy-percent exemption, with lesser disasters reduced proportionally from ninety-percent downward. Exemption applied only to locally retained grain, not transport quotas—a rule that later became permanent.
← Previous Chapter
Back to Chapters
Next Chapter →